/ / /

Measure J versus G fiasco heads to court

One county bureaucratic screw-up: Bad. But two? Brilliant!

Measure J versus G fiasco heads to court
The Stanley Mosk Superior Courthouse in downtown Los Angeles, where trial is scheduled for Feb. 4 in the G-versus-J fiasco. (Photo: Carol M. Highsmith, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons)

Update: Trial in the case has been set for Feb. 4 at 1:30 p.m. Meanwhile, in a second attempt to preserve Measure J, the Board of Supervisors added some charter section renumbering to the Nov. 3 ballot measure for an independent Ethics Commission.

This story was originally published by the John Randolph Haynes and Dora Haynes Foundation.

A lawsuit to preserve a mistakenly repealed Los Angeles County charter amendment relies on a novel legal theory: Two wrongs make a right.

Or to put it another way, a single monumental L.A. county screw-up would have been bad, but it was followed up by a second county flub that was so sweepingly inept that it erased the first mistake.

Whether the court will buy the argument is anyone’s guess.

The double error concerns Measure J, a 2020 ballot measure that sets an annual spending floor for alternatives to incarceration and racial equity programs, and Measure G, a 2024 measure to expand the Board of Supervisors, create an elected executive, establish an Ethics Commission and make several other governance reforms.

Without judicial or voter intervention, Measure J will be inadvertently repealed in 2028 when the elected executive provisions, a key portion of Measure G, kick in.

Continue reading at the John Randolph Haynes and Dora Haynes Foundation

Great! You’ve successfully signed up.

Welcome back! You've successfully signed in.

You've successfully subscribed to Los Angeles Rules.

Success! Check your email for magic link to sign-in.

Success! Your billing info has been updated.

Your billing was not updated.